The Expansion of Neoliberal Policies and the Analysis of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalization is frequently situated at the meeting point of contradictory views on autonomy and equity. The book by Moneta, far from being a pamphlet against globalisation itself, seeks to reinvent the boundaries of a new humanism by the filter of natural exchanges as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By critiquing synthetic interactions that strengthen modern systems of oppression and precarity, the author leans on ancient principles to highlight the failures of our global economic system.
From a historical perspective, globalization is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be linked back to the ideas of the economist Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the England to expand its global commercial influence. Nonetheless, what was originally a commercial development strategy has converted into a control mechanism by High Finance, characterized by the growth of economic liberalism. Contrary to popular belief validated by most economists, the book proves that neoliberalism is truly a structure based on old customs, going back to 4500 years.
The questioning also covers the conduct of the EU, seen as a series of concessions that have served to strengthen the power of financial elites as opposed to safeguarding the rights of citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies often dictated by financial interests opposed to a democratic mandate, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only intensified the doubt of Moneta about the Union’s capacity to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while accepting the past mistakes that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also offers alternatives aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The urgency for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a recurring subject that animates the entire discourse.
The text delves more intensely into the analysis of the domination systems that control global economic exchanges. The study covers the method in which political and economic decisions are manipulated by a restricted circle of powerful financial actors, generally at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, coordinated by means of organizations like the Bank for International Settlements and the IMS, deploys a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The writer exposes how these organisms, under the pretext of economic regulation and stabilization, have over time manipulated stock exchanges and national economies to favor their own benefits. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is presented as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Strongly opposed regarding the handling of the euro, the author presents the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is viewed as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded citizens from governance choices, while amplifying internal differences within the EU.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the increase in national debts, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has diminished standards of living throughout the European territory. The thinker insists that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the EU stays exposed to upcoming crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In essence, the manuscript makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where EU peoples reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, including openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on more equitable and sustainable bases.
More info about Monetary Poverty Line in Europe
The thinker proposes that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a manner that faithfully represents the needs and desires of the European population, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.