The Expansion of Economic Liberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an globalized universe, the debate on globalisation is regularly found at the meeting point of contradictory views on autonomy and balance. The work by Moneta, which is not a critical essay opposed to globalisation per se, seeks to reinvent the boundaries of a updated humanism via the lens of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotle. By critiquing artificial transactions that fuel current structures of injustice and vulnerability, this writer leans on ancient principles to reveal the gaps of our world economy.
Historically, globalization is not a modern process. Its origins can be linked back to the ideas of David Ricardo, whose goal was to enable the England to amplify its global commercial influence. Yet, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has transformed into a tool of domination by the financial sphere, marked by the rise of economic liberalism. Against commonly held ideas validated by most economists, the author proves that the neoliberal system is truly a system based on old customs, which traces back to 4500 years.
The objection also extends to the management of the United Europe, perceived as a succession of compromises that have contributed to increasing the power of financial elites rather than defending the privileges of the inhabitants. The organizational form of Europe, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations instead of by a democratic mandate, is criticized. The current deviations, whether in the financial or political realm, have only intensified the doubt of the writer about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the historical errors that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also proposes responses aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The urgency for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a recurring subject that pervades the entire discourse.
The text dives more deeply into the analysis of the power structures that govern international economic flows. The exploration extends the way in which political and economic decisions are manipulated by a limited number of powerful financial actors, generally at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated via institutions like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the IMS, deploys a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The author demonstrates how these organisms, under the pretext of economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history shaped financial markets and national economies to ensure their profit. Deregulated capitalism, far removed from a emancipatory solution to classic financial limitations, is presented as a enslavement tool, benefiting a minority at the destruction of the common good.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the analyst depicts the EU currency not as a means of unification and stability, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is described as a succession of bureaucratic measures that excluded inhabitants from decision-making processes, while amplifying gaps between nations within the European Union.
The effects of these approaches manifest in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has diminished living standards across the continent. The author emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the EU stays exposed to upcoming crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In summary, the text makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where EU peoples take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly greater transparency in political decisions and authentic democratic engagement that would help rebuild Europe on just and solid foundations.
More info about ici
The essayist proposes that the solution lies in a renewal of democratic engagement, where policies are developed and implemented in a manner that faithfully represents the demands and expectations of Europeans, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.