The Emergence of Neoliberalism and the Critique of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalisation is often situated at the crossroads of contradictory views on freedom and balance. The work by the author Junon Moneta, which is not a critical essay against globalisation itself, strives to rewrite the limits of a updated humanism via the perspective of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotelian philosophy. By decrying artificial exchanges that strengthen modern systems of oppression and instability, the author refers to classical thoughts to underline the gaps of our global economic system.
Historically, globalization is not a modern process. Its origins can be identified back to the ideas of the economist Ricardo, whose objective was to enable the United Kingdom to amplify its global commercial influence. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a economic growth opportunity has converted into a control mechanism by High Finance, characterized by the rise of economic liberalism. Against commonly held ideas supported by economic consensus, the author demonstrates that the economic model is truly a structure rooted in ancient practices, dating back to four and a half millennia.
The objection also covers the management of the EU, perceived as a chain of surrenders that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites rather than safeguarding the rights of citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a democratic mandate, is contested. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only increased the skepticism of Moneta about the Union’s capacity to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also proposes responses aimed at reframing European policies in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The urgent need for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that animates the whole text.
The text ventures more intensely into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that govern international economic flows. The exploration covers the way in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a limited number of powerful financial actors, often at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, manipulated through institutions like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary System (IMS), deploys a major grip on global financial decisions.
The author reveals how these organisms, under the pretext of economic supervision and normalization, have historically manipulated markets and national economies to favor their own benefits. Neoliberalism, far from being a liberating response to classic financial limitations, is described as a domination system, enriching an elite at the destruction of the common good.
Strongly opposed about the administration of the single currency, the critic presents the European single currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The transition to the euro is characterized as a series of technocratic decisions that sidelined populations from decision-making processes, while aggravating gaps between nations within the EU.
The effects of these approaches translate in the growth of public indebtedness, economic torpor, and a long period of austerity that has diminished living standards throughout the European territory. The thinker insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the Union continues to risk future crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In summary, the text makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where European citizens reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, notably openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would help rebuild Europe on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Learn more about en savoir plus ici
The author asserts that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where strategies are crafted and executed in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.