The Rise of Economic Liberalism and the Analysis of Current Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalization is often found at the crossroads of contradictory views on autonomy and equity. The work by Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet against globalisation as such, seeks to reinvent the limits of a modern humanism through the lens of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotelian philosophy. By decrying artificial transactions that support modern systems of oppression and instability, the author refers to classical thoughts to reveal the failures of our world economy.
Historically, globalization is not a recent concept. Its roots can be traced back to the propositions of Ricardo, whose ambition was aimed at allowing the England to amplify its global trade power. Nonetheless, what was once a economic growth opportunity has morphed into a control mechanism by High Finance, symbolized by the rise of economic liberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions validated by most economists, the book proves that the economic model is truly a framework based on old customs, dating back to 4500 years.
The critique also covers the administration of the EU, considered as a succession of compromises that have contributed to increasing the power of financial elites instead of defending the rights of citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its policies often dictated by financial interests instead of by a popular consensus, is contested. The current deviations, whether economic or governmental, have only reinforced the skepticism of the writer about the Union’s capacity to change intrinsically.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the prior faults that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also proposes solutions aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The urgency for a complete revision of Union bodies and governance goals is a central theme that animates the overall content.
The book dives more in depth into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that control global economic exchanges. The analysis extends the manner in which political and financial choices are influenced by a limited number of financial influencers, often at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, manipulated by means of institutions like the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary System (IMS), imposes a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The critic exposes how these entities, under the pretext of economic supervision and normalization, have over time controlled markets and national economies to favor their own benefits. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a emancipatory solution to traditional economic constraints, is considered as a enslavement tool, benefiting a minority at the neglect of collective needs.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the author describes the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The transition to the euro is viewed as a series of technocratic decisions that isolated inhabitants from decision-making processes, while amplifying disparities between member countries within the EU.
The repercussions of these strategies manifest in the increase in national debts, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has diminished living conditions throughout Europe. The author argues that without a major transformation of economic policies, the EU stays exposed to future crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the book makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where European citizens reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It advocates institutional adjustments, notably openness of political mechanisms and genuine civic involvement that would allow Europe to rebuild on fair and lasting principles.
More information about European System of Central Banks
The essayist suggests that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that truly reflects the aspirations and needs of the citizens, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.